Schizophrenia treatment preferences of psychiatrists vs. guidelines: A European perspective
Rojnic Kuzman, Martina; Nortertoft, Merete; Raballo, Andrea; Mohr, Pavel; Fiorillo, Andrea; Dom, Geert; Mihajlovic, Goran; Jendricko, Tihana; Chumakov, Egor; Barjaktarov, Stojan; Carpiniello, Bernardo; Patarák, Michal; Martin, Lorcan; Dudek, Dominika; Samochowiec, Jerzy; Taube, Māris; Courtet, Philippe; Babic, Dragan; Racetovic, Goran; Catthoor, Kirsten; Arango, Celso; Maruta, Nataliya; Basar, Koray; Vahip, Simavi; Szekeres, György; Lien, Lars; Popova, Ana; Zhelev, Ruslan; Jääskeläinen, Erika; Delic, Mirjana; Chkonia, Eka; Chichai, Jana; Telles-Correia, Diogo; Cosman, Doina Constanta Maria; Beezhold, Julian; Falkai, Peter (2025-08-01)
Rojnic Kuzman, Martina
Nortertoft, Merete
Raballo, Andrea
Mohr, Pavel
Fiorillo, Andrea
Dom, Geert
Mihajlovic, Goran
Jendricko, Tihana
Chumakov, Egor
Barjaktarov, Stojan
Carpiniello, Bernardo
Patarák, Michal
Martin, Lorcan
Dudek, Dominika
Samochowiec, Jerzy
Taube, Māris
Courtet, Philippe
Babic, Dragan
Racetovic, Goran
Catthoor, Kirsten
Arango, Celso
Maruta, Nataliya
Basar, Koray
Vahip, Simavi
Szekeres, György
Lien, Lars
Popova, Ana
Zhelev, Ruslan
Jääskeläinen, Erika
Delic, Mirjana
Chkonia, Eka
Chichai, Jana
Telles-Correia, Diogo
Cosman, Doina Constanta Maria
Beezhold, Julian
Falkai, Peter
Cambridge University Press
01.08.2025
Rojnic Kuzman, M., Nordentoft, M., Raballo, A., Mohr, P., Fiorillo, A., Dom, G., … Falkai, P. (2025). Schizophrenia treatment preferences of psychiatrists versus guidelines: A European perspective. European Psychiatry, 68(1), e107. doi:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10072
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202508215514
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202508215514
Tiivistelmä
Abstract
Background:
We aimed to identify therapeutic approaches for managing schizophrenia in different phases and clinical situations – the prodromal phase, first-episode psychosis, cognitive and negative symptoms, pregnancy, treatment resistance, and antipsychotic-induced metabolic side effects – while assessing clinicians’ adherence to guidelines.
Methods:
A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in 2023 as part of the Ambassador project among psychiatrists and trainees from 35 European countries, based on a questionnaire that included six clinical vignettes (cases A–F). Additionally, a review of multiple guidelines/guidance papers was performed.
Results:
The final analysis included 454 participants. Our findings revealed a moderate to high level of agreement among European psychiatrists regarding pharmacological treatment preferences for first-episode psychosis and cognitive and negative symptoms, prodromal symptoms and pregnancy, with moderate adherence to clinical guidelines. There was substantial similarity in treatment preferences for antipsychotic-induced metabolic side effects and treatment resistance; however, adherence to guidelines in these areas was only partial. Despite guideline recommendations, non-pharmacological treatments, including psychotherapy and recovery-oriented care, were generally underutilized, except for psychoeducation and lifestyle recommendations, and cognitive behavioural therapy for treatment of the prodromal phase. Contrary to guidelines, cognitive remediation and physical exercise for cognitive symptoms were significantly neglected.
Conclusions:
These discrepancies highlight the need for effective implementation strategies to bridge the gap between research evidence, clinical guidelines/guidance papers, and real-world clinical practice. Clinicians’ unique combination of knowledge and experience positions them to shape future guidelines, especially where real-world practice diverges from recommendations, reinforcing the need to integrate both research evidence and clinical consensus.
Background:
We aimed to identify therapeutic approaches for managing schizophrenia in different phases and clinical situations – the prodromal phase, first-episode psychosis, cognitive and negative symptoms, pregnancy, treatment resistance, and antipsychotic-induced metabolic side effects – while assessing clinicians’ adherence to guidelines.
Methods:
A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in 2023 as part of the Ambassador project among psychiatrists and trainees from 35 European countries, based on a questionnaire that included six clinical vignettes (cases A–F). Additionally, a review of multiple guidelines/guidance papers was performed.
Results:
The final analysis included 454 participants. Our findings revealed a moderate to high level of agreement among European psychiatrists regarding pharmacological treatment preferences for first-episode psychosis and cognitive and negative symptoms, prodromal symptoms and pregnancy, with moderate adherence to clinical guidelines. There was substantial similarity in treatment preferences for antipsychotic-induced metabolic side effects and treatment resistance; however, adherence to guidelines in these areas was only partial. Despite guideline recommendations, non-pharmacological treatments, including psychotherapy and recovery-oriented care, were generally underutilized, except for psychoeducation and lifestyle recommendations, and cognitive behavioural therapy for treatment of the prodromal phase. Contrary to guidelines, cognitive remediation and physical exercise for cognitive symptoms were significantly neglected.
Conclusions:
These discrepancies highlight the need for effective implementation strategies to bridge the gap between research evidence, clinical guidelines/guidance papers, and real-world clinical practice. Clinicians’ unique combination of knowledge and experience positions them to shape future guidelines, especially where real-world practice diverges from recommendations, reinforcing the need to integrate both research evidence and clinical consensus.
Kokoelmat
- Avoin saatavuus [42527]

