AI-mediated sensemaking in higher education students' learning processes: Tensions, sensemaking practices, and AI-assigned purposes
Silvola, Anni; Kajamaa, Anu; Merikko, Joonas; Muukkonen, Hanni (2025-05-21)
Silvola, Anni
Kajamaa, Anu
Merikko, Joonas
Muukkonen, Hanni
John Wiley & Sons
21.05.2025
Silvola, A., Kajamaa, A., Merikko, J., & Muukkonen, H. (2025). AI-mediated sensemaking in higher education students’ learning processes: Tensions, sensemaking practices, and AI-assigned purposes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 00, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13606
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
© 2025 The Author(s). British Journal of Educational Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BritishEducational Research Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permitsuse, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
© 2025 The Author(s). British Journal of Educational Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BritishEducational Research Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permitsuse, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202505263910
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202505263910
Tiivistelmä
Abstract
Despite a proliferation of research on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and its applications in higher education (HE), our understanding of the transformative processes where students create productive and ethically grounded uses of GenAI and how AI mediates students' sensemaking is still limited. Based on an empirical investigation of bachelor's degree students from educational sciences (N = 22) carrying out an inquiry-based course assignment, we analysed students' reflective essays to explore how GenAI mediated their sensemaking throughout the academic writing process. We selected an abductive analysis as the main approach to examine the AI-mediated construction of new understanding. Cross-tabulation analysis complemented qualitative analysis, addressing differences in AI-mediated sensemaking processes based on students' age. Our findings capture a multidimensional constellation of AI-mediated sensemaking processes. We found three central dynamics that guided students' sensemaking process: assessing and adapting the textual characteristics of AI-mediated writing, adjusting and improving interactions with GenAI, and contextualising AI-mediated academic writing experiences around everyday study practices. The tensions and ambiguities highlighted the ethical aspects of adopting AI-mediated academic writing practices, although students did not overcome all of these tensions during their sensemaking processes. Our study contributes theoretically by developing the notion of an AI-mediated sensemaking approach, therefore adding to existing understanding about the dialogical trajectories of AI-mediated writing processes through which students create new meanings and understandings of GenAI use as a learning resource. Further, we discuss the collective aspects of AI-mediated sensemaking.
Despite a proliferation of research on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and its applications in higher education (HE), our understanding of the transformative processes where students create productive and ethically grounded uses of GenAI and how AI mediates students' sensemaking is still limited. Based on an empirical investigation of bachelor's degree students from educational sciences (N = 22) carrying out an inquiry-based course assignment, we analysed students' reflective essays to explore how GenAI mediated their sensemaking throughout the academic writing process. We selected an abductive analysis as the main approach to examine the AI-mediated construction of new understanding. Cross-tabulation analysis complemented qualitative analysis, addressing differences in AI-mediated sensemaking processes based on students' age. Our findings capture a multidimensional constellation of AI-mediated sensemaking processes. We found three central dynamics that guided students' sensemaking process: assessing and adapting the textual characteristics of AI-mediated writing, adjusting and improving interactions with GenAI, and contextualising AI-mediated academic writing experiences around everyday study practices. The tensions and ambiguities highlighted the ethical aspects of adopting AI-mediated academic writing practices, although students did not overcome all of these tensions during their sensemaking processes. Our study contributes theoretically by developing the notion of an AI-mediated sensemaking approach, therefore adding to existing understanding about the dialogical trajectories of AI-mediated writing processes through which students create new meanings and understandings of GenAI use as a learning resource. Further, we discuss the collective aspects of AI-mediated sensemaking.
Kokoelmat
- Avoin saatavuus [38320]