Advances in commingled human remains analysis between 2014 and 2023
Palmiotto, Andrea; Maijanen, Heli; LeGarde, Carrie B; Ingvoldstad, Megan (2023-12-10)
John Wiley & Sons
10.12.2023
Palmiotto A, Maijanen H, LeGarde CB, Ingvoldstad M. Advances in commingled human remains analysis between 2014 and 2023. J Forensic Sci. 2024; 69: 1604–1619. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15437
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
© 2023 American Academy of Forensic Sciences This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Palmiotto A, Maijanen H, LeGarde CB, Ingvoldstad M. Advances in commingled human remains analysis between 2014 and 2023. J Forensic Sci. 2024; 69: 1604–1619, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15437. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
© 2023 American Academy of Forensic Sciences This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Palmiotto A, Maijanen H, LeGarde CB, Ingvoldstad M. Advances in commingled human remains analysis between 2014 and 2023. J Forensic Sci. 2024; 69: 1604–1619, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15437. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202504032401
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202504032401
Tiivistelmä
Abstract
This study reviews recent advances in osteometric, genetic, geochemical, and digital modeling applications since 2014 to demonstrate the expanded range of analyses and skeletal elements that can be used to separate individuals from commingled contexts. While traditional methods remain foundational to commingling resolution, new advances allow increased individuation, identification of human versus non-human remains, and an amplified scale of assemblages that can be analyzed. This summary offers ways for practitioners to consider the juxtaposition of analytical goals, time, financial concerns, and methods when managing commingled assemblages. Forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology case studies illustrate differences related to application of methods in terms of recovery environments, project goals, and recovered materials. Whether the goal is to isolate and individuate only major elements or as many bones as possible, in nearly all cases, it is best practice to combine several types of methods to fulfill the project scope within the established parameters. This review can help practitioners identify the most appropriate analytical protocols and methods for their projects.
This study reviews recent advances in osteometric, genetic, geochemical, and digital modeling applications since 2014 to demonstrate the expanded range of analyses and skeletal elements that can be used to separate individuals from commingled contexts. While traditional methods remain foundational to commingling resolution, new advances allow increased individuation, identification of human versus non-human remains, and an amplified scale of assemblages that can be analyzed. This summary offers ways for practitioners to consider the juxtaposition of analytical goals, time, financial concerns, and methods when managing commingled assemblages. Forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology case studies illustrate differences related to application of methods in terms of recovery environments, project goals, and recovered materials. Whether the goal is to isolate and individuate only major elements or as many bones as possible, in nearly all cases, it is best practice to combine several types of methods to fulfill the project scope within the established parameters. This review can help practitioners identify the most appropriate analytical protocols and methods for their projects.
Kokoelmat
- Avoin saatavuus [43122]