Hyppää sisältöön
    • FI
    • ENG
  • FI
  • /
  • EN
OuluREPO – Oulun yliopiston julkaisuarkisto / University of Oulu repository
Näytä viite 
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Are there Proto-Slavic loanwords in Saami?

Aikio, Ante (2024-12-19)

 
Avaa tiedosto
nbnfioulu-202502131624.pdf (347.9Kt)
Lataukset: 

URL:
https://doi.org/10.33339/fuf.138042

Aikio, Ante
Suomalais-ugrilainen seura
19.12.2024

Aikio, A. (2024). Are there Proto-Slavic loanwords in Saami?. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen, 2024(69), 5–40. https://doi.org/10.33339/fuf.138042

https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
© Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura 2024.
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
doi:https://doi.org/10.33339/fuf.138042
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202502131624
Tiivistelmä
Abstract

There are two nouns in Saami languages for which Proto-Slavic loan etymologies have been proposed: Proto-Saami *multtē ‘soap’ and *kuompe̮r ‘mushroom’, allegedly borrowed from Proto-Slavic *mỳdlo ‘soap’ and *gǫba ‘mushroom, fungus’. Both etymologies are critically analyzed, and in the process, new etymologies for several other Saami words are also proposed. It is suggested that the two Slavic loan etymologies are examples of the largely overlooked phenomenon of “chance correspondence”: although the matches between the Saami and the Slavic words are phonologically regular and semantically transparent, they nevertheless very probably result from sheer coincidence. The word *multtē ‘soap’ is showed to have an alternative and far more probable Proto-Norse loan etymology, and the Slavic etymology of the word *kuompe̮r turns out to be weak because it does not account for the stem-final consonant *r. This result entails a valuable methodological lesson: in addition to “chance similarities” between languages, there are also “chance correspondences” between them – that is, words that show a regular phonological and semantic match by pure coincidence. Although the latter are much rarer than the former, they nevertheless seem to be more common than is usually assumed. Because of this, far-reaching conclusions (such as assumptions of contact between two reconstructed proto-languages) should not be based on a mere couple of etymologies, no matter how plausible they may seem superficially.
Kokoelmat
  • Avoin saatavuus [38840]
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen
 

Selaa kokoelmaa

NimekkeetTekijätJulkaisuajatAsiasanatUusimmatSivukartta

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen