The reproductive tract microbiome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and across different menstrual cycle phases
Lee, S; Aasmets, O; Arffman, R K; Laru, J; Rossi, H R; Salumets, A; Piltonen, T T; Org, E (2025-01-10)
Avaa tiedosto
Sisältö avataan julkiseksi: 10.01.2026
Lee, S
Aasmets, O
Arffman, R K
Laru, J
Rossi, H R
Salumets, A
Piltonen, T T
Org, E
Oxford University Press
10.01.2025
S Lee, O Aasmets, R K Arffman, J Laru, H R Rossi, A Salumets, T T Piltonen, E Org, The reproductive tract microbiome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and across different menstrual cycle phases, Human Reproduction, Volume 40, Issue 3, March 2025, Pages 518–528, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae270
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
© The Author(s) 2025. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Human reproduction following peer review. The version of record S Lee, O Aasmets, R K Arffman, J Laru, H R Rossi, A Salumets, T T Piltonen, E Org, The reproductive tract microbiome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and across different menstrual cycle phases, Human Reproduction, Volume 40, Issue 3, March 2025, Pages 518–528 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae270.
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
© The Author(s) 2025. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Human reproduction following peer review. The version of record S Lee, O Aasmets, R K Arffman, J Laru, H R Rossi, A Salumets, T T Piltonen, E Org, The reproductive tract microbiome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and across different menstrual cycle phases, Human Reproduction, Volume 40, Issue 3, March 2025, Pages 518–528 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae270.
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202502101559
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202502101559
Tiivistelmä
Abstract
Study question:
Do polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), menstrual cycle phases, and ovulatory status affect reproductive tract (RT) microbiome profiles?
Summary answer:
We identified microbial features associated with menstrual cycle phases in the upper and lower RT microbiome, but only two specific differences in the upper RT according to PCOS status.
What is known already:
The vaginal and uterine microbiome profiles vary throughout the menstrual cycle. Studies have reported alterations in the vaginal microbiome among women diagnosed with PCOS.
Study design, size, duration:
This prospective case-control study included a cohort of 37 healthy control women and 52 women diagnosed with PCOS. Microbiome samples were collected from the vagina as vaginal swabs (VS) and from the uterus as endometrial flushing (EF) aspirate samples, and compared according to PCOS diagnosis, the menstrual cycle phases, and ovulatory status, at Oulu University Hospital (Oulu, Finland) from January 2017 to March 2020.
Participants/materials, setting, methods:
A total of 83 VS samples and 80 EF samples were collected. Age and body mass index (BMI) were matched between women with and without PCOS. Clinical characteristics were assessed using blood samples collected between cycle days 2 and 8, and microbial DNA was sequenced on the Ion Torrent platform. Microbial alpha diversity (i.e. the observed number of unique genera and Shannon diversity index) was analysed across sample types, PCOS diagnosis and menstrual cycle phases. Linear mixed-effects models were utilised to identify microbial features in relation to PCOS and the menstrual cycle phases. Associations between the beta diversity of the RT microbiome and PCOS- and cycle-related clinical features were calculated using PERMANOVA.
Main results and the role of chance:
Microbial alpha diversity showed no difference with PCOS (VS: Pobserved feature = 0.836, Pshannon = 0.998; EF: Pobserved feature = 0.366, Pshannon = 0.185), but varied with menstrual cycle phases (VS: Pobserved feature = 0.001, Pshannon = 0.882; EF: Pobserved feature = 0.026, Pshannon = 0.048). No difference was observed in beta diversity based on either PCOS or the menstrual cycle phases (VS: PPCOS = 0.280, Pcycle = 0.115; EF: PPCOS = 0.234, Pcycle = 0.088). In the endometrial flushing samples, we identified two novel microbial features, characterised by the ratio of differential abundance of two genera, associated with PCOS (FDR ≤ 0.1) and 13 novel features associated with the menstrual cycle phases (FDR ≤ 0.1).
Limitations, reasons for caution:
Although this was the first study to simultaneously analyse, the lower and upper RT microbiome in women with and without PCOS, the limited sample size of anovulatory cases may hinder the detection of differences related to PCOS and ovulatory status.
Wider implications of the findings:
The main finding suggests that PCOS and the menstrual cycle phases are associated with specific microbial features in the upper RT, indicating that the analysis of the upper RT microbiome can potentially identify biomarkers for both PCOS and menstrual cycle phases.
Study funding/competing interest(s):
This research was funded by the Research Council of Finland (grants no. 315921, 321763, 336449), the Sigrid Jusélius Foundation, Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant no. NNF21OC0070372), and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant (MATER, grant no. 813707). This research was also funded by the Estonian Research Council (grants no. PRG1076, PRG1414), the Horizon Europe grant (NESTOR, grant no. 101120075) of the European Commission, and EMBO Installation Grant (grant no. 3573). The funders did not participate in any processes of the study. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Trial registration number:
N/A.
Study question:
Do polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), menstrual cycle phases, and ovulatory status affect reproductive tract (RT) microbiome profiles?
Summary answer:
We identified microbial features associated with menstrual cycle phases in the upper and lower RT microbiome, but only two specific differences in the upper RT according to PCOS status.
What is known already:
The vaginal and uterine microbiome profiles vary throughout the menstrual cycle. Studies have reported alterations in the vaginal microbiome among women diagnosed with PCOS.
Study design, size, duration:
This prospective case-control study included a cohort of 37 healthy control women and 52 women diagnosed with PCOS. Microbiome samples were collected from the vagina as vaginal swabs (VS) and from the uterus as endometrial flushing (EF) aspirate samples, and compared according to PCOS diagnosis, the menstrual cycle phases, and ovulatory status, at Oulu University Hospital (Oulu, Finland) from January 2017 to March 2020.
Participants/materials, setting, methods:
A total of 83 VS samples and 80 EF samples were collected. Age and body mass index (BMI) were matched between women with and without PCOS. Clinical characteristics were assessed using blood samples collected between cycle days 2 and 8, and microbial DNA was sequenced on the Ion Torrent platform. Microbial alpha diversity (i.e. the observed number of unique genera and Shannon diversity index) was analysed across sample types, PCOS diagnosis and menstrual cycle phases. Linear mixed-effects models were utilised to identify microbial features in relation to PCOS and the menstrual cycle phases. Associations between the beta diversity of the RT microbiome and PCOS- and cycle-related clinical features were calculated using PERMANOVA.
Main results and the role of chance:
Microbial alpha diversity showed no difference with PCOS (VS: Pobserved feature = 0.836, Pshannon = 0.998; EF: Pobserved feature = 0.366, Pshannon = 0.185), but varied with menstrual cycle phases (VS: Pobserved feature = 0.001, Pshannon = 0.882; EF: Pobserved feature = 0.026, Pshannon = 0.048). No difference was observed in beta diversity based on either PCOS or the menstrual cycle phases (VS: PPCOS = 0.280, Pcycle = 0.115; EF: PPCOS = 0.234, Pcycle = 0.088). In the endometrial flushing samples, we identified two novel microbial features, characterised by the ratio of differential abundance of two genera, associated with PCOS (FDR ≤ 0.1) and 13 novel features associated with the menstrual cycle phases (FDR ≤ 0.1).
Limitations, reasons for caution:
Although this was the first study to simultaneously analyse, the lower and upper RT microbiome in women with and without PCOS, the limited sample size of anovulatory cases may hinder the detection of differences related to PCOS and ovulatory status.
Wider implications of the findings:
The main finding suggests that PCOS and the menstrual cycle phases are associated with specific microbial features in the upper RT, indicating that the analysis of the upper RT microbiome can potentially identify biomarkers for both PCOS and menstrual cycle phases.
Study funding/competing interest(s):
This research was funded by the Research Council of Finland (grants no. 315921, 321763, 336449), the Sigrid Jusélius Foundation, Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant no. NNF21OC0070372), and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant (MATER, grant no. 813707). This research was also funded by the Estonian Research Council (grants no. PRG1076, PRG1414), the Horizon Europe grant (NESTOR, grant no. 101120075) of the European Commission, and EMBO Installation Grant (grant no. 3573). The funders did not participate in any processes of the study. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Trial registration number:
N/A.
Kokoelmat
- Avoin saatavuus [38865]
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineisto, joilla on samankaltaisia nimekkeitä, tekijöitä tai asiasanoja.
-
Impact of gut microbiome on skin health : gut-skin axis observed through the lenses of therapeutics and skin diseases
Mahmud, Md. Rayhan; Akter, Sharmin; Tamanna, Sanjida Khanam; Mazumder, Lincon; Esti, Israt Zahan; Banerjee, Sanchita; Akter, Sumona; Hasan, Md. Rakibul; Acharjee, Mrityunjoy; Hossain, Md. Sajjad; Pirttilä, Anna Maria
Gut microbes : 1 (Informa, 22.07.2022) -
Polydextrose changes the gut microbiome and attenuates fasting triglyceride and cholesterol levels in Western diet fed mice
Raza, Ghulam Shere; Putaala, Heli; Hibberd, Ashley A.; Alhoniemi, Esa; Tiihonen, Kirsti; Mäkelä, Kari Antero; Herzig, Karl-Heinz
Scientific reports (Springer Nature, 13.07.2017) -
Environmental radiation alters the gut microbiome of the bank vole <em>Myodes glareolus</em>
Lavrinienko, Anton; Mappes, Tapio; Tukalenko, Eugene; Mousseau, Timothy A.; Møller, Anders P.; Knight, Rob; Morton, James T.; Thompson, Luke R.; Watts, Phillip C.
The ISME journal : 11 (Springer Nature, 09.07.2018)