A transdisciplinary, comparative analysis reveals key risks from Arctic permafrost thaw
Gartler, Susanna; Scheer, Johanna; Meyer, Alexandra; Abass, Khaled; Bartsch, Annett; Doloisio, Natalia; Falardeau, Jade; Hugelius, Gustaf; Irrgang, Anna; Haukur Ingimundarson, Jón; Jungsberg, Leneisja; Lantuit, Hugues; Nymand Larsen, Joan; Lodi, Rachele; Martin, Victoria Sophie; Mercer, Louise; Nielsen, David; Overduin, Paul; Povoroznyuk, Olga; Rautio, Arja; Schweitzer, Peter; Speetjens, Niek Jesse; Tomaškovičová, Soňa; Timlin, Ulla; Vanderlinden, Jean-Paul; Vonk, Jorien; Westerveld, Levi; Ingeman-Nielsen, Thomas (2025-01-16)
Gartler, Susanna
Scheer, Johanna
Meyer, Alexandra
Abass, Khaled
Bartsch, Annett
Doloisio, Natalia
Falardeau, Jade
Hugelius, Gustaf
Irrgang, Anna
Haukur Ingimundarson, Jón
Jungsberg, Leneisja
Lantuit, Hugues
Nymand Larsen, Joan
Lodi, Rachele
Martin, Victoria Sophie
Mercer, Louise
Nielsen, David
Overduin, Paul
Povoroznyuk, Olga
Rautio, Arja
Schweitzer, Peter
Speetjens, Niek Jesse
Tomaškovičová, Soňa
Timlin, Ulla
Vanderlinden, Jean-Paul
Vonk, Jorien
Westerveld, Levi
Ingeman-Nielsen, Thomas
Springer
16.01.2025
Gartler, S., Scheer, J., Meyer, A. et al. A transdisciplinary, comparative analysis reveals key risks from Arctic permafrost thaw. Commun Earth Environ 6, 21 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01883-w
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© The Author(s) 2025. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© The Author(s) 2025. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202501221293
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202501221293
Tiivistelmä
Abstract
Permafrost thaw poses diverse risks to Arctic environments and livelihoods. Understanding the effects of permafrost thaw is vital for informed policymaking and adaptation efforts. Here, we present the consolidated findings of a risk analysis spanning four study regions: Longyearbyen (Svalbard, Norway), the Avannaata municipality (Greenland), the Beaufort Sea region and the Mackenzie River Delta (Canada) and the Bulunskiy District of the Sakha Republic (Russia). Local stakeholders’ and scientists’ perceptions shaped our understanding of the risks as dynamic, socionatural phenomena involving physical processes, key hazards, and societal consequences. Through an inter- and transdisciplinary risk analysis based on multidirectional knowledge exchanges and thematic network analysis, we identified five key hazards of permafrost thaw. These include infrastructure failure, disruption of mobility and supplies, decreased water quality, challenges for food security, and exposure to diseases and contaminants. The study’s novelty resides in the comparative approach spanning different disciplines, environmental and societal contexts, and the transdisciplinary synthesis considering various risk perceptions.
Permafrost thaw poses diverse risks to Arctic environments and livelihoods. Understanding the effects of permafrost thaw is vital for informed policymaking and adaptation efforts. Here, we present the consolidated findings of a risk analysis spanning four study regions: Longyearbyen (Svalbard, Norway), the Avannaata municipality (Greenland), the Beaufort Sea region and the Mackenzie River Delta (Canada) and the Bulunskiy District of the Sakha Republic (Russia). Local stakeholders’ and scientists’ perceptions shaped our understanding of the risks as dynamic, socionatural phenomena involving physical processes, key hazards, and societal consequences. Through an inter- and transdisciplinary risk analysis based on multidirectional knowledge exchanges and thematic network analysis, we identified five key hazards of permafrost thaw. These include infrastructure failure, disruption of mobility and supplies, decreased water quality, challenges for food security, and exposure to diseases and contaminants. The study’s novelty resides in the comparative approach spanning different disciplines, environmental and societal contexts, and the transdisciplinary synthesis considering various risk perceptions.
Kokoelmat
- Avoin saatavuus [38821]