LXRP and Community Engagement
Walker, Derek H.T.; Aaltonen, Kirsi; Love, Peter E.D.; Betts, Mark (2024-10-18)
Avaa tiedosto
Sisältö avataan julkiseksi: 18.10.2025
Routledge
18.10.2024
Walker, D., Aaltonen, K., Love, P., & Betts, M. (2024). LXRP and community engagement. In M. Betts, P. E. D. Love, & D. H. T. Walker (Eds.), Strategic integrated program delivery: Learning from the level crossing removal project (pp. 196-215). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003389170_11
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge in Strategic Integrated Program Delivery Learning from the Level Crossing Removal Project on 18 October 2024, available online: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003389170. It is deposited under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge in Strategic Integrated Program Delivery Learning from the Level Crossing Removal Project on 18 October 2024, available online: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003389170. It is deposited under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202412317550
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202412317550
Tiivistelmä
Abstract
We investigate how the Level Crossing Removal Program (LXRP) conceptualises/delivers its engagement strategy with project internal and external (nonmarket) stakeholders, focussing on community benefit delivery through its safer rail/road interfaces, improved rail station facilities, upgrading signalling and communications as well as providing a positive community legacy.
Community engagement went beyond the immediately affected commercial stakeholders to embrace local community and the wider travelling community. This chapter compares best practice and theories of stakeholder engagement with the LXRP, providing insights from the program that may be helpful to readers beyond an integrated project delivery (IPD)/Alliancing context. LXRA had created a sophisticated communication web site and had integrated key result areas (KRAs) key performance indicators (KPIs) for community engagement and legacy into the governance system. The legacy concept demonstrates a highly social benefit value-centred focus. This is important when considering nuances in benefits management between a value-for-money (VfM) and best value (BV) mindset.
We investigate how the Level Crossing Removal Program (LXRP) conceptualises/delivers its engagement strategy with project internal and external (nonmarket) stakeholders, focussing on community benefit delivery through its safer rail/road interfaces, improved rail station facilities, upgrading signalling and communications as well as providing a positive community legacy.
Community engagement went beyond the immediately affected commercial stakeholders to embrace local community and the wider travelling community. This chapter compares best practice and theories of stakeholder engagement with the LXRP, providing insights from the program that may be helpful to readers beyond an integrated project delivery (IPD)/Alliancing context. LXRA had created a sophisticated communication web site and had integrated key result areas (KRAs) key performance indicators (KPIs) for community engagement and legacy into the governance system. The legacy concept demonstrates a highly social benefit value-centred focus. This is important when considering nuances in benefits management between a value-for-money (VfM) and best value (BV) mindset.
Kokoelmat
- Avoin saatavuus [38865]
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/