Patients' Experiences of Healthcare Professionals' Competence in Digital Counselling in Healthcare Settings-A Qualitative Systematic Review
Kaihlaniemi, Juulia; Suonnansalo, Petra; Kääriäinen, Maria; Kaakinen, Pirjo; Litendahl, Maija; Paukkonen, Leila; Laukkonen, Kirsi; Oikarinen, Anne (2024-12-09)
Kaihlaniemi, Juulia
Suonnansalo, Petra
Kääriäinen, Maria
Kaakinen, Pirjo
Litendahl, Maija
Paukkonen, Leila
Laukkonen, Kirsi
Oikarinen, Anne
Wiley-Blackwell
09.12.2024
Kaihlaniemi, J., Suonnansalo, P., Kääriäinen, M., Kaakinen, P., Litendahl, M., Paukkonen, L., Laukkonen, K. and Oikarinen, A. (2024), Patients' Experiences of Healthcare Professionals' Competence in Digital Counselling in Healthcare Settings—A Qualitative Systematic Review. J Adv Nurs. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16663
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202412107161
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202412107161
Tiivistelmä
Abstract
Aim:
To critically appraise and synthesise qualitative evidence about patients' experiences of healthcare professionals' competence in digital counselling in healthcare settings.
Design:
A qualitative systematic review.
Methods:
The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. The review included studies that focused on patient experiences of healthcare professionals' competence in digital counselling and were published in English, Finnish or Swedish, with no time limits. Study selection, quality appraisal and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Findings from the studies included were pooled using the meta-aggregation method.
Data Sources:
Eight databases (Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycArticles, Medic, Medline (Ovid), EBSCO Open Dissertations and MedNar) were systematically searched on 25 September 2023.
Results:
Sixteen studies (published between 2009 and 2023) were included in the review, from which 42 findings were extracted and organised into eight categories based on their meaning. Three synthesised findings were identified: (1) Competence to provide efficient digital counselling, (2) competence to support patient self-management during digital counselling and (3) competence in establishing a reciprocal relationship in digital counselling.
Conclusion:
The evidence from the review can be used to support healthcare professionals' competence in digital counselling. It was found that competence in digital counselling includes the competence to provide digital counselling that is efficient and enables counselling to be implemented in health care, supports patients to self-manage and establishes a reciprocal counselling relationship in a digital environment.
Implications for the Profession and Patient Care:
Recognising healthcare professionals' competence in digital counselling can enhance their motivation and professional growth, potentially improving the quality of services and patient outcomes. These findings can inform the development of healthcare education, fostering the training of more competent healthcare professionals and digital counsellors.
Reporting Method:
The review was undertaken and reported using the PRISMA guidelines.
Protocol Registration:
PROSPERO CRD42024499509.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
Aim:
To critically appraise and synthesise qualitative evidence about patients' experiences of healthcare professionals' competence in digital counselling in healthcare settings.
Design:
A qualitative systematic review.
Methods:
The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. The review included studies that focused on patient experiences of healthcare professionals' competence in digital counselling and were published in English, Finnish or Swedish, with no time limits. Study selection, quality appraisal and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Findings from the studies included were pooled using the meta-aggregation method.
Data Sources:
Eight databases (Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycArticles, Medic, Medline (Ovid), EBSCO Open Dissertations and MedNar) were systematically searched on 25 September 2023.
Results:
Sixteen studies (published between 2009 and 2023) were included in the review, from which 42 findings were extracted and organised into eight categories based on their meaning. Three synthesised findings were identified: (1) Competence to provide efficient digital counselling, (2) competence to support patient self-management during digital counselling and (3) competence in establishing a reciprocal relationship in digital counselling.
Conclusion:
The evidence from the review can be used to support healthcare professionals' competence in digital counselling. It was found that competence in digital counselling includes the competence to provide digital counselling that is efficient and enables counselling to be implemented in health care, supports patients to self-manage and establishes a reciprocal counselling relationship in a digital environment.
Implications for the Profession and Patient Care:
Recognising healthcare professionals' competence in digital counselling can enhance their motivation and professional growth, potentially improving the quality of services and patient outcomes. These findings can inform the development of healthcare education, fostering the training of more competent healthcare professionals and digital counsellors.
Reporting Method:
The review was undertaken and reported using the PRISMA guidelines.
Protocol Registration:
PROSPERO CRD42024499509.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
Kokoelmat
- Avoin saatavuus [38840]