Influence of 3D structural design on the electrochemical performances of Aluminum metal as anode for Li-ion batteries
Ricci, Marco; Krammer, Martin; Marras, Sergio; Molaiyan, Palanivel; Proietti, Remo; Paolella, Andrea (2024-08-13)
Ricci, Marco
Krammer, Martin
Marras, Sergio
Molaiyan, Palanivel
Proietti, Remo
Paolella, Andrea
John Wiley & Sons
13.08.2024
M. Ricci, S. Marras, M. Krammer, M. Palanivel, R. Proietti Zaccaria, A. Paolella, ChemPhysChem 2024, 25, e202400493. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202400493
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© 2024 The Authors. ChemPhysChem published by Wiley-VCH. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© 2024 The Authors. ChemPhysChem published by Wiley-VCH. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202410306516
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202410306516
Tiivistelmä
Abstract
Aluminum (Al) is one of the most promising active materials for producing next-generation negative electrodes for lithium (Li)-ion batteries. It features low density, high specific capacity, and low working potential, making it ideal for producing energy-dense cells. However, this material loses its electrochemical activity within 100 cycles, making it practically unusable. Several claims in the literature support the idea that a dual degradation mechanism is at play. First, the slow diffusion of Li in the Al matrix causes the electrochemical reactions to be partly irreversible, making the initial capacity of the cell drop. Second, the stress caused by cycling make the active material pulverize and lose activity. Recent work shows that shortening the diffusion path of Li by 3D structuring is an effective way to mitigate the first capacity loss mechanism, while alloying Al with other elements effectively mitigates the second one. In this work, we demonstrate that the benefits of 3D structuring and alloying are cumulative and that a mesh made of an Al-magnesium alloy performs better than both a pure Al foil and a foil of an Al−Mg alloy.
Aluminum (Al) is one of the most promising active materials for producing next-generation negative electrodes for lithium (Li)-ion batteries. It features low density, high specific capacity, and low working potential, making it ideal for producing energy-dense cells. However, this material loses its electrochemical activity within 100 cycles, making it practically unusable. Several claims in the literature support the idea that a dual degradation mechanism is at play. First, the slow diffusion of Li in the Al matrix causes the electrochemical reactions to be partly irreversible, making the initial capacity of the cell drop. Second, the stress caused by cycling make the active material pulverize and lose activity. Recent work shows that shortening the diffusion path of Li by 3D structuring is an effective way to mitigate the first capacity loss mechanism, while alloying Al with other elements effectively mitigates the second one. In this work, we demonstrate that the benefits of 3D structuring and alloying are cumulative and that a mesh made of an Al-magnesium alloy performs better than both a pure Al foil and a foil of an Al−Mg alloy.
Kokoelmat
- Avoin saatavuus [38840]