The genetic architecture of repeated local adaptation to climate in distantly related plants
Whiting, James R; Booker, Tom R; Rougeux, Clément; Lind, Brandon M; Singh, Pooja; Lu, Mengmeng; Huang, Kaichi; Whitlock, Michael C; Aitken, Sally N; Andrew, Rose L; Borevitz, Justin O; Bruhl, Jeremy J; Collins, Timothy L; Fischer, Martin C; Hodgins, Kathryn A; Holliday, Jason A; Ingvarsson, Pär K; Janes, Jasmine K; Khandaker, Momena; Koenig, Daniel; Kreiner, Julia M; Kremer, Antoine; Lascoux, Martin; Leroy, Thibault; Milesi, Pascal; Murray, Kevin D; Pyhäjärvi, Tanja; Rellstab, Christian; Rieseberg, Loren H; Roux, Fabrice; Stinchcombe, John R; Telford, Ian R H; Todesco, Marco; Tyrmi, Jaakko S; Wang, Baosheng; Weigel, Detlef; Willi, Yvonne; Wright, Stephen I; Zhou, Lecong; Yeaman, Sam (2024-08-26)
Whiting, James R
Booker, Tom R
Rougeux, Clément
Lind, Brandon M
Singh, Pooja
Lu, Mengmeng
Huang, Kaichi
Whitlock, Michael C
Aitken, Sally N
Andrew, Rose L
Borevitz, Justin O
Bruhl, Jeremy J
Collins, Timothy L
Fischer, Martin C
Hodgins, Kathryn A
Holliday, Jason A
Ingvarsson, Pär K
Janes, Jasmine K
Khandaker, Momena
Koenig, Daniel
Kreiner, Julia M
Kremer, Antoine
Lascoux, Martin
Leroy, Thibault
Milesi, Pascal
Murray, Kevin D
Pyhäjärvi, Tanja
Rellstab, Christian
Rieseberg, Loren H
Roux, Fabrice
Stinchcombe, John R
Telford, Ian R H
Todesco, Marco
Tyrmi, Jaakko S
Wang, Baosheng
Weigel, Detlef
Willi, Yvonne
Wright, Stephen I
Zhou, Lecong
Yeaman, Sam
Macmillan
26.08.2024
Whiting, J.R., Booker, T.R., Rougeux, C. et al. The genetic architecture of repeated local adaptation to climate in distantly related plants. Nat Ecol Evol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02514-5
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© The Author(s) 2024. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© The Author(s) 2024. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202409065722
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202409065722
Tiivistelmä
Abstract
Closely related species often use the same genes to adapt to similar environments. However, we know little about why such genes possess increased adaptive potential and whether this is conserved across deeper evolutionary lineages. Adaptation to climate presents a natural laboratory to test these ideas, as even distantly related species must contend with similar stresses. Here, we re-analyse genomic data from thousands of individuals from 25 plant species as diverged as lodgepole pine and Arabidopsis (~300 Myr). We test for genetic repeatability based on within-species associations between allele frequencies in genes and variation in 21 climate variables. Our results demonstrate significant statistical evidence for genetic repeatability across deep time that is not expected under randomness, identifying a suite of 108 gene families (orthogroups) and gene functions that repeatedly drive local adaptation to climate. This set includes many orthogroups with well-known functions in abiotic stress response. Using gene co-expression networks to quantify pleiotropy, we find that orthogroups with stronger evidence for repeatability exhibit greater network centrality and broader expression across tissues (higher pleiotropy), contrary to the ‘cost of complexity’ theory. These gene families may be important in helping wild and crop species cope with future climate change, representing important candidates for future study.
Closely related species often use the same genes to adapt to similar environments. However, we know little about why such genes possess increased adaptive potential and whether this is conserved across deeper evolutionary lineages. Adaptation to climate presents a natural laboratory to test these ideas, as even distantly related species must contend with similar stresses. Here, we re-analyse genomic data from thousands of individuals from 25 plant species as diverged as lodgepole pine and Arabidopsis (~300 Myr). We test for genetic repeatability based on within-species associations between allele frequencies in genes and variation in 21 climate variables. Our results demonstrate significant statistical evidence for genetic repeatability across deep time that is not expected under randomness, identifying a suite of 108 gene families (orthogroups) and gene functions that repeatedly drive local adaptation to climate. This set includes many orthogroups with well-known functions in abiotic stress response. Using gene co-expression networks to quantify pleiotropy, we find that orthogroups with stronger evidence for repeatability exhibit greater network centrality and broader expression across tissues (higher pleiotropy), contrary to the ‘cost of complexity’ theory. These gene families may be important in helping wild and crop species cope with future climate change, representing important candidates for future study.
Kokoelmat
- Avoin saatavuus [34589]