Comparing multispectral and hyperspectral UAV data for detecting peatland vegetation patterns
Pang, Yuwen; Räsänen, Aleksi; Wolff, Franziska; Tahvanainen, Teemu; Männikkö, Milja; Aurela, Mika; Korpelainen, Pasi; Kumpula, Timo; Virtanen, Tarmo (2024-07-18)
Pang, Yuwen
Räsänen, Aleksi
Wolff, Franziska
Tahvanainen, Teemu
Männikkö, Milja
Aurela, Mika
Korpelainen, Pasi
Kumpula, Timo
Virtanen, Tarmo
Elsevier
18.07.2024
Pang, Y., Räsänen, A., Wolff, F., Tahvanainen, T., Männikkö, M., Aurela, M., Korpelainen, P., Kumpula, T., & Virtanen, T. (2024). Comparing multispectral and hyperspectral UAV data for detecting peatland vegetation patterns. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 132, 104043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2024.104043
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202408075256
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202408075256
Tiivistelmä
Abstract
Northern peatland vegetation exhibits fine-scale spatial and spectral heterogeneity that can potentially be captured with uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) data due to their ultra-high spatial resolution (<10 cm). From this perspective, the contribution of different spectral sensors in mapping various vegetation characteristics has not been thoroughly investigated. We delineated spatial patterns of plant community clusters, plant functional types (PFTs), and selected plant species with UAV hyperspectral (HS), UAV multispectral (MS), and airborne LiDAR (light detection and ranging) topography (TP) data in two northern peatlands. We conducted random forest (RF) regressions in a geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) framework and compared the relative contributions of the different datasets. In the best regression models, the percentage of explained variance was 24–74 % (RMSE:0.24–0.31), 40–90 % (RMSE:0.12–0.41), and 18–90 % (RMSE:0.03–0.40) for plant community clusters, PFTs, and plant species, respectively. The MS-TP combination had, in many cases, the highest performance, while HS-based models had better performance for some plant community clusters, PFTs, and plant species. TP features were useful only in certain situations. Overall, our results suggest that UAV MS imagery combined with TP data outperformed or performed at least almost as well as the models using UAV HS data and while all data combinations are capable for fine-scale detection of vegetation in northern peatlands. A more comprehensive investigations of data processing and methodology selection is needed to conclude if there is an added value of UAV HS data for peatland vegetation monitoring.
Northern peatland vegetation exhibits fine-scale spatial and spectral heterogeneity that can potentially be captured with uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) data due to their ultra-high spatial resolution (<10 cm). From this perspective, the contribution of different spectral sensors in mapping various vegetation characteristics has not been thoroughly investigated. We delineated spatial patterns of plant community clusters, plant functional types (PFTs), and selected plant species with UAV hyperspectral (HS), UAV multispectral (MS), and airborne LiDAR (light detection and ranging) topography (TP) data in two northern peatlands. We conducted random forest (RF) regressions in a geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) framework and compared the relative contributions of the different datasets. In the best regression models, the percentage of explained variance was 24–74 % (RMSE:0.24–0.31), 40–90 % (RMSE:0.12–0.41), and 18–90 % (RMSE:0.03–0.40) for plant community clusters, PFTs, and plant species, respectively. The MS-TP combination had, in many cases, the highest performance, while HS-based models had better performance for some plant community clusters, PFTs, and plant species. TP features were useful only in certain situations. Overall, our results suggest that UAV MS imagery combined with TP data outperformed or performed at least almost as well as the models using UAV HS data and while all data combinations are capable for fine-scale detection of vegetation in northern peatlands. A more comprehensive investigations of data processing and methodology selection is needed to conclude if there is an added value of UAV HS data for peatland vegetation monitoring.
Kokoelmat
- Avoin saatavuus [38840]