Anisotropy of T2 and T1ρ relaxation time in articular cartilage at 3 T
Kantola, Ville; Karjalainen, Jouni; Jaakola, Tomi; Leskinen, Henri P P; Nissi, Mikko J; Casula, Victor; Nieminen, Miika T (2024-04-01)
Kantola, Ville
Karjalainen, Jouni
Jaakola, Tomi
Leskinen, Henri P P
Nissi, Mikko J
Casula, Victor
Nieminen, Miika T
John Wiley & Sons
01.04.2024
Kantola V, Karjalainen J, Jaakola T, et al. Anisotropy of T2 and T1ρ relaxation time in articular cartilage at 3 T. Magn Reson Med. 2024; 92(3): 1177-1188. doi: 10.1002/mrm.30096
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© 2024 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© 2024 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202405284007
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202405284007
Tiivistelmä
Abstract
Purpose:
The anisotropy of R2 and R1ρ relaxation rates in articular cartilage contains information about the collagenous structure of the tissue. Here we determine and study the anisotropic and isotropic components of T2 and T1ρ relaxation parameters in articular cartilage with a clinical 3T MRI device. Furthermore, a visual representation of the topographical variation in anisotropy is given via anisotropy mapping.
Methods:
Eight bovine stifle joints were imaged at 22 orientations with respect to the main magnetic field using T2, continuous-wave (CW) T1ρ, and adiabatic T1ρ mapping sequences. Relaxation rates were separated into isotropic and anisotropic relaxation components using a previously established relaxation anisotropy model. Pixel-wise anisotropy values were determined from the relaxation-time maps using Michelson contrast.
Results:
The relaxation rates obtained from the samples displayed notable variation depending on the sample orientation, magnetization preparation, and cartilage layer. R2 demonstrated significant anisotropy, whereas CW-R1ρ (300 Hz) and CW-R1ρ (500 Hz) displayed a low degree of anisotropy. Adiabatic R1ρ was largely isotropic. In the deep cartilage regions, relaxation rates were generally faster and more anisotropic than in the cartilage closer to the tissue surface. The isotropic relaxation rate components were found to have similar values regardless of measurement sequence.
Conclusions:
The fitted relaxation model for T2 and T1ρ demonstrated varying amounts anisotropy, depending on magnetization preparation, and studied the articular cartilage layer. Anisotropy mapping of full joints showed varying amounts of anisotropy depending on the quantitative MRI parameter and topographical location, and in the case of T2, showed systematic changes in anisotropy across cartilage depth.
Purpose:
The anisotropy of R2 and R1ρ relaxation rates in articular cartilage contains information about the collagenous structure of the tissue. Here we determine and study the anisotropic and isotropic components of T2 and T1ρ relaxation parameters in articular cartilage with a clinical 3T MRI device. Furthermore, a visual representation of the topographical variation in anisotropy is given via anisotropy mapping.
Methods:
Eight bovine stifle joints were imaged at 22 orientations with respect to the main magnetic field using T2, continuous-wave (CW) T1ρ, and adiabatic T1ρ mapping sequences. Relaxation rates were separated into isotropic and anisotropic relaxation components using a previously established relaxation anisotropy model. Pixel-wise anisotropy values were determined from the relaxation-time maps using Michelson contrast.
Results:
The relaxation rates obtained from the samples displayed notable variation depending on the sample orientation, magnetization preparation, and cartilage layer. R2 demonstrated significant anisotropy, whereas CW-R1ρ (300 Hz) and CW-R1ρ (500 Hz) displayed a low degree of anisotropy. Adiabatic R1ρ was largely isotropic. In the deep cartilage regions, relaxation rates were generally faster and more anisotropic than in the cartilage closer to the tissue surface. The isotropic relaxation rate components were found to have similar values regardless of measurement sequence.
Conclusions:
The fitted relaxation model for T2 and T1ρ demonstrated varying amounts anisotropy, depending on magnetization preparation, and studied the articular cartilage layer. Anisotropy mapping of full joints showed varying amounts of anisotropy depending on the quantitative MRI parameter and topographical location, and in the case of T2, showed systematic changes in anisotropy across cartilage depth.
Kokoelmat
- Avoin saatavuus [34593]