Repairing disrupted care processes as sources of stability, learning and change in a Finnish hospital: An activity-theoretical study
Kajamaa, Anu; Lahtinen, Päivikki; Mattick, Karen; Bethune, Rob (2024-05-06)
Kajamaa, Anu
Lahtinen, Päivikki
Mattick, Karen
Bethune, Rob
John Wiley & Sons
06.05.2024
Kajamaa A, Lahtinen P, Mattick K, Bethune R. Repairing disrupted care processes as sources of stability, learning and change in a Finnish hospital: An activity-theoretical study. Med Educ. 2024; 58(12): 1502-1514. doi:10.1111/medu.15407
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© 2024 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© 2024 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202405103258
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202405103258
Tiivistelmä
Abstract
Introduction:
In high-income countries, it is estimated that one in every 10 patients is harmed while receiving hospital care; 50% of these are preventable. The aim of this study was to deepen our understanding of disruptions of care processes and how the repairing of disruptions can be sources of stability, learning and change in complex health care settings.
Methods:
The organisational interactions associated with disruptions in the standard care processes of 15 surgical patients were followed in a public sector hospital in Finland. The patients and medical professionals were interviewed in situ during the observation of the care processes. An activity-theoretically informed methodological framework was used to identify and analyse disruptions and the associated repair efforts and repair solutions.
Results:
Disruptions were frequent and found in all 15 care processes. These related to (1) the patient's worsening physiological state, (2) the equipment used in surgical care, (3) the information flow, (4) delays in the care process and (5) the unclear division of labour within the team. The actors carried out three types of repair efforts (technical, cognitive-emotional and extended collaborative) to overcome the disrupted processes, which usually led to repair solutions that restored stability.
Discussion:
The different repair efforts required different kinds of collaboration and learning. Extended collaborative repair was most demanding, providing challenges and opportunities for practice change and expansive learning.
Introduction:
In high-income countries, it is estimated that one in every 10 patients is harmed while receiving hospital care; 50% of these are preventable. The aim of this study was to deepen our understanding of disruptions of care processes and how the repairing of disruptions can be sources of stability, learning and change in complex health care settings.
Methods:
The organisational interactions associated with disruptions in the standard care processes of 15 surgical patients were followed in a public sector hospital in Finland. The patients and medical professionals were interviewed in situ during the observation of the care processes. An activity-theoretically informed methodological framework was used to identify and analyse disruptions and the associated repair efforts and repair solutions.
Results:
Disruptions were frequent and found in all 15 care processes. These related to (1) the patient's worsening physiological state, (2) the equipment used in surgical care, (3) the information flow, (4) delays in the care process and (5) the unclear division of labour within the team. The actors carried out three types of repair efforts (technical, cognitive-emotional and extended collaborative) to overcome the disrupted processes, which usually led to repair solutions that restored stability.
Discussion:
The different repair efforts required different kinds of collaboration and learning. Extended collaborative repair was most demanding, providing challenges and opportunities for practice change and expansive learning.
Kokoelmat
- Avoin saatavuus [37744]