Evidence for socially influenced and potentially actively coordinated cooperation by bumblebees
Loukola, Olli J.; Antinoja, Anna; Mäkelä, Kaarle; Arppi, Janette; Peng, Fei; Solvi, Cwyn (2024-05-01)
Loukola, Olli J.
Antinoja, Anna
Mäkelä, Kaarle
Arppi, Janette
Peng, Fei
Solvi, Cwyn
Royal Society Publishing
01.05.2024
Loukola, O. J., Antinoja, A., Mäkelä, K., Arppi, J., Peng, F., & Solvi, C. (2024). Evidence for socially influenced and potentially actively coordinated cooperation by bumblebees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 291(2022), 20240055. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.0055
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© 2024 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© 2024 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202405033088
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202405033088
Tiivistelmä
Abstract
Cooperation is common in animals, yet the specific mechanisms driving collaborative behaviour in different species remain unclear. We investigated the proximate mechanisms underlying the cooperative behaviour of bumblebees in two different tasks, where bees had to simultaneously push a block in an arena or a door at the end of a tunnel for access to reward. In both tasks, when their partner’s entry into the arena/tunnel was delayed, bees took longer to first push the block/door compared with control bees that learned to push alone. In the tunnel task, just before gaining access to reward, bees were more likely to face towards their partner than expected by chance or compared with controls. These results show that bumblebees’ cooperative behaviour is not simply a by-product of individual efforts but is socially influenced. We discuss how bees’ turning behaviours, e.g. turning around before first reaching the door when their partner was delayed and turning back towards the door in response to seeing their partner heading towards the door, suggest the potential for active coordination. However, because these behaviours could also be interpreted as combined responses to social and secondary reinforcement cues, future studies are needed to help clarify whether bumblebees truly use active coordination.
Cooperation is common in animals, yet the specific mechanisms driving collaborative behaviour in different species remain unclear. We investigated the proximate mechanisms underlying the cooperative behaviour of bumblebees in two different tasks, where bees had to simultaneously push a block in an arena or a door at the end of a tunnel for access to reward. In both tasks, when their partner’s entry into the arena/tunnel was delayed, bees took longer to first push the block/door compared with control bees that learned to push alone. In the tunnel task, just before gaining access to reward, bees were more likely to face towards their partner than expected by chance or compared with controls. These results show that bumblebees’ cooperative behaviour is not simply a by-product of individual efforts but is socially influenced. We discuss how bees’ turning behaviours, e.g. turning around before first reaching the door when their partner was delayed and turning back towards the door in response to seeing their partner heading towards the door, suggest the potential for active coordination. However, because these behaviours could also be interpreted as combined responses to social and secondary reinforcement cues, future studies are needed to help clarify whether bumblebees truly use active coordination.
Kokoelmat
- Avoin saatavuus [37744]