A systematic study on the processes of lignin extraction and nanodispersion to control properties and functionality
Sheridan, Ekaterina; Filonenko, Svitlana; Volikov, Alexander; Sirvio, Juho Antti; Antonietti, Markus (2024-01-17)
Sheridan, Ekaterina
Filonenko, Svitlana
Volikov, Alexander
Sirvio, Juho Antti
Antonietti, Markus
Royal society of chemistry
17.01.2024
Green Chem., 2024,26, 2967-2984, https://doi.org/10.1039/D3GC04299E
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202403252424
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202403252424
Tiivistelmä
Abstract
This article reviews a variety of literature-reported lignin isolation procedures that bring partly minor but important changes in the produced extracts. Five lignins were produced or acquired from various sources and characterized based on their thermal properties, molecular weights, chemical structures, as well as elemental compositions, which were all found to depend on their extraction methods. These extracts were then used to produce 5 different nanolignins using 2 similar facile solvent shifting methods with the difference being an alteration in pH. The nanolignins were characterized after the solvent shifting accounting for differences in pH. Nanolignins generated via only solvent exchange exhibited diameters ranging from 58 nm to 95 nm, while nanolignins precipitated using a solvent shifting method along with a shift in pH exhibited diameters ranging from 10 nm to 34 nm and dissimilar morphology, size, and surface charge. Those differences highlight the control options for nanolignin preparetion on the colloidal length scale. Understanding how different lignins can be used to generate nanolignins is mandatory for unlocking the possibilities of nanolignin for functional material applications. These nanolignins can be applied in construction, medical, and/or agricultural industries as renewable, biodegradable alternatives to existing polymer dispersions.
This article reviews a variety of literature-reported lignin isolation procedures that bring partly minor but important changes in the produced extracts. Five lignins were produced or acquired from various sources and characterized based on their thermal properties, molecular weights, chemical structures, as well as elemental compositions, which were all found to depend on their extraction methods. These extracts were then used to produce 5 different nanolignins using 2 similar facile solvent shifting methods with the difference being an alteration in pH. The nanolignins were characterized after the solvent shifting accounting for differences in pH. Nanolignins generated via only solvent exchange exhibited diameters ranging from 58 nm to 95 nm, while nanolignins precipitated using a solvent shifting method along with a shift in pH exhibited diameters ranging from 10 nm to 34 nm and dissimilar morphology, size, and surface charge. Those differences highlight the control options for nanolignin preparetion on the colloidal length scale. Understanding how different lignins can be used to generate nanolignins is mandatory for unlocking the possibilities of nanolignin for functional material applications. These nanolignins can be applied in construction, medical, and/or agricultural industries as renewable, biodegradable alternatives to existing polymer dispersions.
Kokoelmat
- Avoin saatavuus [37744]