Metformin and Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills in the Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Melin, Johanna; Forslund, Maria; Alesi, Simon; Piltonen, Terhi; Romualdi, Daniela; Spritzer, Poli Mara; Tay, Chau Thien; Pena, Alexia; Witchel, Selma Feldman; Mousa, Aya; Teede, Helena (2023-08-09)
Melin, Johanna
Forslund, Maria
Alesi, Simon
Piltonen, Terhi
Romualdi, Daniela
Spritzer, Poli Mara
Tay, Chau Thien
Pena, Alexia
Witchel, Selma Feldman
Mousa, Aya
Teede, Helena
Oxford University Press
09.08.2023
Johanna Melin, Maria Forslund, Simon Alesi, Terhi Piltonen, Daniela Romualdi, Poli Mara Spritzer, Chau Thien Tay, Alexia Pena, Selma Feldman Witchel, Aya Mousa, Helena Teede, Metformin and Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills in the Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Volume 109, Issue 2, February 2024, Pages e817–e836, https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgad465
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202312153843
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202312153843
Tiivistelmä
Abstract
Context:
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) affects more than 1 in 10 women.
Objective:
As part of the 2023 International PCOS Guidelines update, comparisons between combined oral contraceptive pills (COCP), metformin, and combination treatment were evaluated.
Data Sources:
Ovid Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, All EBM, and CINAHL were searched.
Study Selection:
Women with PCOS included in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Data Extraction:
We calculated mean differences and 95% CIs regarding anthropometrics, metabolic, and hyperandrogenic outcomes. Meta-analyses and quality assessment using GRADE were performed.
Data Synthesis:
The search identified 1660 publications; 36 RCTs were included. For hirsutism, no differences were seen when comparing metformin vs COCP, nor when comparing COCP vs combination treatment with metformin and COCP. Metformin was inferior on free androgen index (FAI) (7.08; 95% CI 4.81, 9.36), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) (−118.61 nmol/L; 95% CI −174.46, −62.75) and testosterone (0.48 nmol/L; 95% CI 0.32, 0.64) compared with COCP. COCP was inferior for FAI (0.58; 95% CI 0.36, 0.80) and SHBG (−16.61 nmol/L; 95% CI −28.51, −4.71) compared with combination treatment, whereas testosterone did not differ. Metformin lowered insulin (−27.12 pmol/L; 95% CI −40.65, −13.59) and triglycerides (−0.15 mmol/L; 95% CI −0.29, −0.01) compared with COCP. COCP was inferior for insulin (17.03 pmol/L; 95% CI 7.79, 26.26) and insulin resistance (0.44; 95% CI 0.17, 0.70) compared with combination treatment.
Conclusions:
The choice of metformin or COCP treatment should be based on symptoms, noting some biochemical benefits from combination treatment targeting both major endocrine disturbances seen in PCOS (hyperinsulinemia and hyperandrogenism).
Context:
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) affects more than 1 in 10 women.
Objective:
As part of the 2023 International PCOS Guidelines update, comparisons between combined oral contraceptive pills (COCP), metformin, and combination treatment were evaluated.
Data Sources:
Ovid Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, All EBM, and CINAHL were searched.
Study Selection:
Women with PCOS included in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Data Extraction:
We calculated mean differences and 95% CIs regarding anthropometrics, metabolic, and hyperandrogenic outcomes. Meta-analyses and quality assessment using GRADE were performed.
Data Synthesis:
The search identified 1660 publications; 36 RCTs were included. For hirsutism, no differences were seen when comparing metformin vs COCP, nor when comparing COCP vs combination treatment with metformin and COCP. Metformin was inferior on free androgen index (FAI) (7.08; 95% CI 4.81, 9.36), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) (−118.61 nmol/L; 95% CI −174.46, −62.75) and testosterone (0.48 nmol/L; 95% CI 0.32, 0.64) compared with COCP. COCP was inferior for FAI (0.58; 95% CI 0.36, 0.80) and SHBG (−16.61 nmol/L; 95% CI −28.51, −4.71) compared with combination treatment, whereas testosterone did not differ. Metformin lowered insulin (−27.12 pmol/L; 95% CI −40.65, −13.59) and triglycerides (−0.15 mmol/L; 95% CI −0.29, −0.01) compared with COCP. COCP was inferior for insulin (17.03 pmol/L; 95% CI 7.79, 26.26) and insulin resistance (0.44; 95% CI 0.17, 0.70) compared with combination treatment.
Conclusions:
The choice of metformin or COCP treatment should be based on symptoms, noting some biochemical benefits from combination treatment targeting both major endocrine disturbances seen in PCOS (hyperinsulinemia and hyperandrogenism).
Kokoelmat
- Avoin saatavuus [38670]