CSI-free rotary antenna beamforming for massive RF wireless energy transfer

Abstract

<div lang="en" class="abs"><p class="abs_header">Abstract</p><p>Radio-frequency (RF) wireless energy transfer (WET) is a key technology that may allow seamlessly powering future massive low-energy Internet of Things (IoT) networks. To enable efficient massive WET, channel state information (CSI)-limited/free multiantenna transmit schemes have been recently proposed in the literature. The idea is to reduce/null the energy costs to be paid by energy harvesting (EH) IoT nodes from participating in large-scale time/power-consuming CSI training, but still enable some transmit spatial gains. In this article, we take another step forward by proposing a novel CSI-free rotary antenna beamforming (RAB) WET scheme that outperforms all state-of-the-art CSI-free schemes in a scenario, where a power beacon (PB) equipped with a uniform linear array (ULA) powers a large set of surrounding EH IoT devices. RAB uses a properly designed CSI-free beamformer combined with a continuous or periodic rotation of the ULA at the PB to provide average EH gains that scale as \(0.85\sqrt{M}\), where \(M\) is the number of PB’s antenna elements. Moreover, a rotation-specific power control mechanism was proposed to: 1) fairly optimize the WET process if devices’ positioning information is available and/or 2) avoid hazards to human health in terms of specific absorption rate (SAR), which is an RF exposure metric that quantifies the absorbed power in a unit mass of human tissue. We show that RAB performance even approaches quickly (or surpasses, for scenarios with a sufficiently large number of EH devices, or when using the proposed power control) the performance of a traditional full-CSI-based transmit scheme, and it is also less sensitive to SAR constraints. Finally, we discuss important practicalities related to RAB such as its robustness against non line-of-sight (LOS) conditions compared to other CSI-free WET schemes, and its generalizability to scenarios where the PB uses other than a ULA topology.</p></div>