Toward the development of deep-learning analyses for snow avalanche releases in mountain regions
Chen, Yunzhi; Chen, Wei; Rahmati, Omid; Falah, Fatemeh; Kulakowski, Dominik; Lee, Saro; Rezaie, Fatemeh; Panahi, Mahdi; Bahmani, Aref; Darabi, Hamid; Torabi Haghighi, Ali; Bian, Huiyuan (2021-09-27)
Yunzhi Chen, Wei Chen, Omid Rahmati, Fatemeh Falah, Dominik Kulakowski, Saro Lee, Fatemeh Rezaie, Mahdi Panahi, Aref Bahmani, Hamid Darabi, Ali Torabi Haghighi & Huiyuan Bian (2022) Toward the development of deep learning analyses for snow avalanche releases in mountain regions, Geocarto International, 37:25, 7855-7880, DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2021.1986578
© The Author(s). This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Geocarto International on 27 Sep 2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/10106049.2021.1986578.
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021101250731
Tiivistelmä
Abstract
Snow avalanches impose a considerable threat to infrastructure and human safety in snow bound mountain areas. Nevertheless, the spatial prediction of snow avalanches has received little research attention in many vulnerable parts of the world, particularly in developing countries. The present study investigates the applicability of a stand-alone convolutional neural network (CNN) model, as a deep-learning approach, along with two metaheuristic algorithms including grey wolf optimization (CNN-GWO) and imperialist competitive algorithm (CNN-ICA) in snow avalanche modeling in the Darvan watershed, Iran. The analysis was based on thirteen potential drivers of avalanche occurrence and an inventory map of previously documented avalanche occurrences. The efficiency of models’ performance was evaluated by Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) and the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). The CNN-ICA model yielded the highest accuracy in both training (AUC= 0.982, RMSE =0.067) and validation (AUC= 0.972, RMSE =0.125) steps, followed by the CNN-GWO model (AUC of 0.975 for training, RMSE of 0.18 for training, AUC of 0.968 for validation, RMSE of 0.157 for validation). However, the standalone CNN model showed lower goodness-of-fit (AUC= 0.864, RMSE =0.22) and predictive performance (AUC= 0.811, RMSE =0.330). The approach utilized in this study is broadly applicable for identifying areas where avalanche hazard is likely to be high and where mitigation measures or corresponding land use planning should be prioritized.
Kokoelmat
- Avoin saatavuus [34546]