Hyppää sisältöön
    • FI
    • ENG
  • FI
  • /
  • EN
OuluREPO – Oulun yliopiston julkaisuarkisto / University of Oulu repository
Näytä viite 
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Survival of patients with asbestosis can be assessed by risk-predicting models

Keskitalo, Eerika; Salonen, Johanna; Vähänikkilä, Hannu; Kaarteenaho, Riitta (2021-02-26)

 
Avaa tiedosto
nbnfi-fe202201121902.pdf (169.2Kt)
nbnfi-fe202201121902_meta.xml (41.99Kt)
nbnfi-fe202201121902_solr.xml (35.68Kt)
Lataukset: 

URL:
http://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-106819

Keskitalo, Eerika
Salonen, Johanna
Vähänikkilä, Hannu
Kaarteenaho, Riitta
BMJ
26.02.2021

Keskitalo E, Salonen J, Vähänikkilä H, et al. Survival of patients with asbestosis can be assessed by risk-predicting models. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2021;78:516-521. http://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-106819

https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This article has been accepted for publication in Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2021 following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at http://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-106819.
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-106819
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202201121902
Tiivistelmä

Abstract

Objectives: Our aim was to investigate the pulmonary function test (PFT) results of patients with asbestosis and determine whether baseline PFTs and the risk-predicting models such as gender, age and physiologic (GAP) variables model and composite physiologic index (CPI) would be useful in predicting survival in these patients.

Methods: Demographics and PFTs of 100 patients with asbestosis were evaluated. The survival difference between the GAP stages was determined with Kaplan-Meier survival curves with statistical significance analysed with log-rank test. The suitability of the risk-predicting models and baseline PFTs to predict the survival of patients was analysed with Cox regression.

Results: At baseline, the mean value of diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was 65%; for forced vital capacity it was 81%, with restrictive lung function being the most common impairment. The median estimated survival of the patients was 124 months, that is, 171 months in GAP stage I, 50 months in stage II and 21 months in stage III (p<0.001). CPI, DLCO% predicted, age at baseline and GAP stage were significant predictors of mortality (all p values under 0.001).

Conclusions: GAP and CPI as well as baseline DLCO% predicted were significant parameters in the evaluation of the prognosis of the patients with asbestosis; they may be useful in clinical practice when considering treatment strategies of individual patients.

Kokoelmat
  • Avoin saatavuus [38821]
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen
 

Selaa kokoelmaa

NimekkeetTekijätJulkaisuajatAsiasanatUusimmatSivukartta

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen