Hyppää sisältöön
    • FI
    • ENG
  • FI
  • /
  • EN
OuluREPO – Oulun yliopiston julkaisuarkisto / University of Oulu repository
Näytä viite 
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Perceptions of creativity in software engineering research and practice

Mohanani, Rahul; Ram, Prabhat; Lasisi, Ahmed; Ralph, Paul; Turhan, Burak (2017-09-28)

 
Avaa tiedosto
nbnfi-fe202103177629.pdf (411.7Kt)
nbnfi-fe202103177629_meta.xml (37.81Kt)
nbnfi-fe202103177629_solr.xml (31.34Kt)
Lataukset: 

URL:
https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2017.21

Mohanani, Rahul
Ram, Prabhat
Lasisi, Ahmed
Ralph, Paul
Turhan, Burak
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
28.09.2017

R. Mohanani, P. Ram, A. Lasisi, P. Ralph and B. Turhan, "Perceptions of Creativity in Software Engineering Research and Practice," 2017 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), Vienna, Austria, 2017, pp. 210-217, doi: 10.1109/SEAA.2017.21

https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
© 2017 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2017.21
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202103177629
Tiivistelmä

Abstract

Software engineering, especially design and requirements engineering, is intensely creative. However, practitioners and researchers appear to perceive creativity differently, hindering knowledge transfer. To explore and understand these perceptual differences, this paper combines a systematic mapping study of SE research literature with an interview study of practitioners. The subsequent analysis of 84 primary studies and 17 semi-structured interviews reveal some agreement (e.g. creativity is a process that produces novel and useful ideas). However, it also reveals important differences in the way creativity is conceptualized, measured and improved. These differences undermine evidence-based techniques to enhance and measure creativity in SE research and practice.

Kokoelmat
  • Avoin saatavuus [38824]
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen
 

Selaa kokoelmaa

NimekkeetTekijätJulkaisuajatAsiasanatUusimmatSivukartta

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen