Axolotls’ and mices’ oral-maxillofacial trephining wounds heal differently

Abstract

<div lang="en" class="abs"><p class="abs_header">Abstract</p><p>The <em>Ambystoma maxicanum</em> (axolotl) regenerates strikingly from wounds and amputations. Comparing its healing ability to non-regenerative species such as the mouse should help narrow in on mechanisms to improve human wound healing. Here, the tongue and intermandibular soft tissues of both mice (C57BL/6NCrl) and axolotls were wounded with a 2–2.5 mm punch biopsy. The study aimed to compare the differences between these 2 species following surgical resection with regard to the macroscopic and histological characteristics. These include wound closure times, epithelial wound sealing and thickness as well as acute immune marker myeloperoxidase (MPO) response over 30 days. Post surgery, mice visually showed greater haemorrhage; their wounds immediately collapsed while it took 14 days for the axolotls mandibular void to close. The epithelium sealed the axolotls’ wound margins within 24 h with a maximal mean thickness of 0.42 ± 0.13-fold normalized to unwounded skin. In mice, the epithelium separately sealed the ventral and dorsal sides, respectively at 7 and 7–30 days with mean maximal epithelial thicknesses reaching 13 ± 5.6 and 3.0 ± 0.63-fold. Mean MPO-positive cell values peaked in axolotls at 14 ± 1.5-fold between hours 6–12; while in mice, it peaked at 8.7 ± 0.9-fold between hours 24–96. We conclude that axolotls form smaller blood clots, have a faster and thinner epithelial cell migrating front, and a shorter MPO-positive cell response in comparison to mice. These observations may help refine future oral and facial wound-healing research and treatment. </p></div>