Hyppää sisältöön
    • FI
    • ENG
  • FI
  • /
  • EN
OuluREPO – Oulun yliopiston julkaisuarkisto / University of Oulu repository
Näytä viite 
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Living with death : what moral consideration of mortuary practices reveals about the plurality of worldviews in the multi-millennial past of Central Fennoscandia

Hakonen, A.; Hakamäki, V. (2019-10-24)

 
Avaa tiedosto
nbnfi-fe2021060433986.pdf (435.2Kt)
nbnfi-fe2021060433986_meta.xml (29.21Kt)
nbnfi-fe2021060433986_solr.xml (26.99Kt)
Lataukset: 

URL:
https://doi.org/10.1080/1751696X.2019.1681744

Hakonen, A.
Hakamäki, V.
Informa
24.10.2019

A. Hakonen & V. Hakamäki (2019) Living with death: what moral consideration of mortuary practices reveals about the plurality of worldviews in the multi-millennial past of Central Fennoscandia, Time and Mind, 12:4, 287-304, DOI: 10.1080/1751696X.2019.1681744

https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Time and Mind: The Journal of Archaeology, Consciousness and Culture on 24 Oct 2019, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/1751696X.2019.1681744
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1751696X.2019.1681744
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021060433986
Tiivistelmä

Abstract

Mortuary practices evident in the materiality of Central Fennoscandia in Northern Europe are interpreted here rather unconventionally as expressions of morality. This is defined as the culturally approved way to manage death, without scruples. The last seven millennia are set on a flat temporal scale in this paper, revealing contradictions between different ideologies and worldviews over that time. The ubiquitous themes that emerge are agency of place and the bond between fire, life, and death, along with the main criticism, which asserts that the overwhelming fear of the dead reported in the region during 2nd millennium may have been aggravated by Christian dogma. Thus, projecting similar notions of fear to local prehistoric burials is problematic and should be made with caution. The study acts as a reminder that archaeological interpretation is drawn from theory — the interpretational key — which affects both the hypotheses and the results. Changing the key may turn even an established interpretation on its head.

Kokoelmat
  • Avoin saatavuus [37744]
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen
 

Selaa kokoelmaa

NimekkeetTekijätJulkaisuajatAsiasanatUusimmatSivukartta

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen