Hyppää sisältöön
    • FI
    • ENG
  • FI
  • /
  • EN
OuluREPO – Oulun yliopiston julkaisuarkisto / University of Oulu repository
Näytä viite 
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Non-numerical strategies used by bees to solve numerical cognition tasks

MaBouDi, HaDi; Barron, Andrew B.; Li, Sun; Honkanen, Maria; Loukola, Olli J.; Peng, Fei; Li, Wenfeng; Marshall, James A. R.; Cope, Alex; Vasilaki, Eleni; Solvi, Cwyn (2021-02-17)

 
Avaa tiedosto
nbnfi-fe202102225597.pdf (1.083Mt)
nbnfi-fe202102225597_meta.xml (53.71Kt)
nbnfi-fe202102225597_solr.xml (42.57Kt)
Lataukset: 

URL:
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2711

MaBouDi, HaDi
Barron, Andrew B.
Li, Sun
Honkanen, Maria
Loukola, Olli J.
Peng, Fei
Li, Wenfeng
Marshall, James A. R.
Cope, Alex
Vasilaki, Eleni
Solvi, Cwyn
The Royal Society
17.02.2021

MaBouDi, H., Barron, A. B., Li, S., Honkanen, M., Loukola, O. J., Peng, F., Li, W., Marshall, J. A. R., Cope, A., Vasilaki, E., & Solvi, C. (2021). Non-numerical strategies used by bees to solve numerical cognition tasks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 288(1945), 20202711. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2711

https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2711
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202102225597
Tiivistelmä

Abstract

We examined how bees solve a visual discrimination task with stimuli commonly used in numerical cognition studies. Bees performed well on the task, but additional tests showed that they had learned continuous (non-numerical) cues. A network model using biologically plausible visual feature filtering and a simple associative rule was capable of learning the task using only continuous cues inherent in the training stimuli, with no numerical processing. This model was also able to reproduce behaviours that have been considered in other studies indicative of numerical cognition. Our results support the idea that a sense of magnitude may be more primitive and basic than a sense of number. Our findings highlight how problematic inadvertent continuous cues can be for studies of numerical cognition. This remains a deep issue within the field that requires increased vigilance and cleverness from the experimenter. We suggest ways of better assessing numerical cognition in non-speaking animals, including assessing the use of all alternative cues in one test, using cross-modal cues, analysing behavioural responses to detect underlying strategies, and finding the neural substrate.

Kokoelmat
  • Avoin saatavuus [38840]
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen
 

Selaa kokoelmaa

NimekkeetTekijätJulkaisuajatAsiasanatUusimmatSivukartta

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen