Hyppää sisältöön
    • FI
    • ENG
  • FI
  • /
  • EN
OuluREPO – Oulun yliopiston julkaisuarkisto / University of Oulu repository
Näytä viite 
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Empirical software engineering experts on the use of students and professionals in experiments

Falessi, Davide; Juristo, Natalia; Wohlin, Claes; Turhan, Burak; Münch, Jürgen; Jedlitschka, Andreas; Oivo, Markku (2017-06-08)

 
Avaa tiedosto
nbnfi-fe2020040914194.pdf (1.509Mt)
nbnfi-fe2020040914194_meta.xml (41.61Kt)
nbnfi-fe2020040914194_solr.xml (41.37Kt)
Lataukset: 

URL:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9523-3

Falessi, Davide
Juristo, Natalia
Wohlin, Claes
Turhan, Burak
Münch, Jürgen
Jedlitschka, Andreas
Oivo, Markku
Springer Nature
08.06.2017

Falessi, D., Juristo, N., Wohlin, C. et al. Empirical software engineering experts on the use of students and professionals in experiments. Empir Software Eng 23, 452–489 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9523-3

https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Empirical Software Engineering. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9523-3.
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9523-3
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2020040914194
Tiivistelmä

Abstract

Context: Controlled experiments are an important empirical method to generate and validate theories. Many software engineering experiments are conducted with students. It is often claimed that the use of students as participants in experiments comes at the cost of low external validity while using professionals does not.

Objective We believe a deeper understanding is needed on the external validity of software engineering experiments conducted with students or with professionals. We aim to gain insight about the pros and cons of using students and professionals in experiments.

Method We performed an unconventional, focus group approach and a follow-up survey. First, during a session at ISERN 2014, 65 empirical researchers, including the seven authors, argued and discussed the use of students in experiments with an open mind. Afterwards, we revisited the topic and elicited experts’ opinions to foster discussions. Then we derived 14 statements and asked the ISERN attendees excluding the authors, to provide their level of agreement with the statements. Finally, we analyzed the researchers’ opinions and used the findings to further discuss the statements.

Results Our survey results showed that, in general, the respondents disagreed with us about the drawbacks of professionals. We, on the contrary, strongly believe that no population (students, professionals, or others) can be deemed better than another in absolute terms.

Conclusion Using students as participants remains a valid simplification of reality needed in laboratory contexts. It is an effective way to advance software engineering theories and technologies but, like any other aspect of study settings, should be carefully considered during the design, execution, interpretation, and reporting of an experiment. The key is to understand which developer population portion is being represented by the participants in an experiment. Thus, a proposal for describing experimental participants is put forward.

Kokoelmat
  • Avoin saatavuus [38823]
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen
 

Selaa kokoelmaa

NimekkeetTekijätJulkaisuajatAsiasanatUusimmatSivukartta

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen