Territory–network interplay in the co-constitution of the Arctic and ‘to-be’ Arctic states

Abstract

<div lang="en" class="abs"><p class="abs_header">Abstract</p><p>This paper discusses the (re)production of state and supranational regional spaces through speech acts. Emphasis is placed especially on speech acts that ‘construct’ regions and concurrently (re)position specific states as ‘legitimized’ actors within supranational space. Relatedly, focus is directed to how such repositioning is linked to territory–network interplay in establishing and contesting power relations in supranational regional institutions. The paper discusses first how the region-building process in the Arctic — and power relations within the Arctic Council — has relied on territorial legitimation in which ‘Arctic states’ are rendered as the key ‘Arctic’ actors. The focus is then shifted to how France and Japan, states considered ‘non-Arctic’, have recently repositioned themselves in relation to the region in order to gain legitimacy. The key conclusion of the analysis is that by engaging with the observer criteria set by the Arctic Council, ‘non-Arctic’ states are redefining themselves in relation to the region, simultaneously (re)producing the Arctic region and non-Arctic states in relation to each other. This paper also argues that in attempting to dismantle some of the territorial criteria on which the established power relations within the Arctic Council rely, these states are pursuing the reinstitutionalization of a ‘global’ Arctic with renegotiated power relations.</p></div>