Hyppää sisältöön
    • FI
    • ENG
  • FI
  • /
  • EN
OuluREPO – Oulun yliopiston julkaisuarkisto / University of Oulu repository
Näytä viite 
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Long bone diaphyseal shape follows different ontogenetic trajectories in captive and wild gorillas

Canington, Stephanie L.; Sylvester, Adam D.; Burgess, M. Loring; Junno, Juho-Antti; Ruff, Christopher B. (2018-08-29)

 
Avaa tiedosto
nbnfi-fe202002105000.pdf (596.5Kt)
nbnfi-fe202002105000_meta.xml (38.18Kt)
nbnfi-fe202002105000_solr.xml (39.98Kt)
Lataukset: 

URL:
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23636

Canington, Stephanie L.
Sylvester, Adam D.
Burgess, M. Loring
Junno, Juho-Antti
Ruff, Christopher B.
John Wiley & Sons
29.08.2018

Canington, SL, Sylvester, AD, Burgess, ML, Junno, J‐A, Ruff, CB. Long bone diaphyseal shape follows different ontogenetic trajectories in captive and wild gorillas. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2018; 167: 366– 376. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23636

https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Canington, SL, Sylvester, AD, Burgess, ML, Junno, J‐A, Ruff, CB. Long bone diaphyseal shape follows different ontogenetic trajectories in captive and wild gorillas. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2018; 167: 366– 376, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23636. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving."
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23636
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202002105000
Tiivistelmä

Abstract

Objectives: A number of studies have demonstrated the ontogenetic plasticity of long bone diaphyseal structure in response to mechanical loading. Captivity should affect mechanical loading of the limbs, but whether captive apes grow differently than wild apes has been debated. Here, we compare captive and wild juvenile and adult Gorilla to ascertain whether growth trajectories in cross‐sectional diaphyseal shape are similar in the two environments.

Materials and methods: A sample of young juvenile (n = 4) and adult (n = 10) captive Gorilla gorilla gorilla specimens, with known life histories, were compared with age‐matched wild G.g. gorilla (n = 62) and G. beringei beringei (n = 75) in relative anteroposterior to mediolateral bending strength of the femur, tibia, and humerus. Cross sections were obtained using peripheral quantitative CT.

Results: Captive and wild adult G.g. gorilla differed in bending strength ratios for all three bones, but these differences were not present in young juvenile G.g. gorilla. In comparisons across taxa, captive juvenile G.g. gorilla were more similar to wild G.g. gorilla than to G.b. beringei, while captive adult G.g. gorilla were more similar in shape to G.b. beringei in the hind limb.

Discussion: Captive and wild G. gorilla follow different ontogenetic trajectories in long bone diaphyseal shape, corresponding to environmental differences and subsequent modified locomotor behaviors. Differences related to phylogeny are most evident early in development.

Kokoelmat
  • Avoin saatavuus [38821]
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen
 

Selaa kokoelmaa

NimekkeetTekijätJulkaisuajatAsiasanatUusimmatSivukartta

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen