Hyppää sisältöön
    • FI
    • ENG
  • FI
  • /
  • EN
OuluREPO – Oulun yliopiston julkaisuarkisto / University of Oulu repository
Näytä viite 
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Discipline-making and organizational permeability of the university : discussing the notion of organizational field

Kantasalmi, Kari; Tuunainen, Juha (2018-10-17)

 
Avaa tiedosto
nbnfi-fe2019041212056.pdf (412.8Kt)
nbnfi-fe2019041212056_meta.xml (31.94Kt)
nbnfi-fe2019041212056_solr.xml (29.99Kt)
Lataukset: 

URL:
https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X201857

Kantasalmi, Kari
Tuunainen, Juha
Emerald
17.10.2018

Kari Kantasalmi & Juha Tuunainen (2018) Discipline-making and Organizational Permeability of the University: Discussing the Notion of Organizational Field. Chapter in Leopold Ringel, Petra Hiller & Charlene Zietsma (eds.) Towards Permeable Boundaries of Organizations? Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Emerald, Bingley, UK.

https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
© 2018 Emerald Publishing Limited. Published in in Leopold Ringel, Petra Hiller & Charlene Zietsma (eds.) Towards Permeable Boundaries of Organizations? Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Emerald, Bingley, UK. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X201857
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X201857
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2019041212056
Tiivistelmä

Abstract

Close interaction between universities, industries and governments has given rise to hybrid organizations incorporating economic development alongside scientific research and higher education. We will approach this phenomenon and the related organization-theoretical problems by looking at two cases of discipline making to discuss the potential of the concept of organizational field introduced by the neoinstitutionalist school of organization theory. As this concept presumes the Bourdieusian theory of social fields, we will consider possibilities of reflective contesting of the states of doxain discipline making in regard to organizational aspects of disciplinary boundaries in the university-centered system of higher education, its demarcation to business and schooling, as well as to the related ideology of professionalism and science policy. We will also comment on the Bourdieusian conceptuality inscribed in the neoinstitutionalist metaphor of organizational field from the perspective of systems theory inspired by Luhmann. This is because we believe that further development of the semantic focus in the problem of disciplinary boundaries would benefit from Luhmannian tools designed to grasp organizations as social systems that facilitate interrelations of differentiated function systems relevant for discipline making in current technoscience.

Kokoelmat
  • Avoin saatavuus [38841]
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen
 

Selaa kokoelmaa

NimekkeetTekijätJulkaisuajatAsiasanatUusimmatSivukartta

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen