Hyppää sisältöön
    • FI
    • ENG
  • FI
  • /
  • EN
OuluREPO – Oulun yliopiston julkaisuarkisto / University of Oulu repository
Näytä viite 
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of menisci and cartilage (dGEMRIM/dGEMRIC) in obese patients with knee osteoarthritis : cross-sectional study of 85 obese patients with intra-articular administered gadolinium contrast

Hangaard, Stine; Gudbergsen, Henrik; Daugaard, Cecilie L.; Bliddal, Henning; Nybing, Janus Damm; Nieminen, Miika T.; Casula, Victor; Tiderius, Carl‐Johan; Boesen, Mikael (2018-08-13)

 
Avaa tiedosto
nbnfi-fe2019121648357.pdf (369.4Kt)
nbnfi-fe2019121648357_meta.xml (49.26Kt)
nbnfi-fe2019121648357_solr.xml (54.06Kt)
Lataukset: 

URL:
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26190

Hangaard, Stine
Gudbergsen, Henrik
Daugaard, Cecilie L.
Bliddal, Henning
Nybing, Janus Damm
Nieminen, Miika T.
Casula, Victor
Tiderius, Carl‐Johan
Boesen, Mikael
John Wiley & Sons
13.08.2018

Hangaard, S., Gudbergsen, H., Daugaard, C.L., Bliddal, H., Nybing, J.D., Nieminen, M.T., Casula, V., Tiderius, C.‐J. and Boesen, M. (2018), Delayed gadolinium‐enhanced MRI of menisci and cartilage (dGEMRIM/dGEMRIC) in obese patients with knee osteoarthritis: Cross‐sectional study of 85 obese patients with intra‐articular administered gadolinium contrast. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 48: 1700-1706. doi:10.1002/jmri.26190

https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
© 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Hangaard, S., Gudbergsen, H., Daugaard, C.L., Bliddal, H., Nybing, J.D., Nieminen, M.T., Casula, V., Tiderius, C.‐J. and Boesen, M. (2018), Delayed gadolinium‐enhanced MRI of menisci and cartilage (dGEMRIM/dGEMRIC) in obese patients with knee osteoarthritis: Cross‐sectional study of 85 obese patients with intra‐articular administered gadolinium contrast. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 48: 1700-1706, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26190. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26190
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2019121648357
Tiivistelmä

Abstract

Background: Early cartilage changes in knee osteoarthritis (OA) can be assessed by both intravenous (i.v.) and intra‐articular (i.a.) delayed gadolinium‐enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC).

Purpose: To examine the relationship between i.a. dGEMRIC and delayed gadolinium‐enhanced MRI of menisci (dGEMRIM), and to investigate if the approach can be used to assess the morphological degeneration of menisci in obese patients with knee OA.

Study Type: Cross‐sectional.

Population: Eighty‐five obese patients with knee OA.

Field Strength/Sequences: 1.5T. Inversion recovery sequence with four inversion times.

Assessment: T1 relaxation times were calculated for posterior weight‐bearing femoral cartilage and the posterior horns of the menisci. Meniscus degeneration sum score (0–2) was assessed as increased signal/no signal (1/0) and tear/no tear (1/0).

Statistical Tests: T₁ relaxation times were compared using Student’s t‐test. Comparison of cartilage and meniscus T₁ relaxation times was done by regression analysis. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparison of meniscal T₁ relaxation times among the three summed morphological scores (0–2). Statistical analyses were performed with a level of significance at 0.05.

Results: For lateral menisci, morphology sum scores of 0, 1, and 2 were found in 13, 58, and 14 patients and for medial menisci in 2, 30, and 30 patients, respectively. Mean T₁ relaxation times were 441 msec, 480 msec, and 497 msec for cartilage, lateral menisci, and medial menisci, respectively. T₁ relaxation times for the menisci were similar (P = 0.53), and a weak correlation was found between dGEMRIC and dGEMRIM in the lateral compartments (R = 0.26). Comparing dGEMRIM between different morphology sum scores showed no differences (P > 0.4).

Data Conclusion: I.a. dGEMRIM showed no correlation between the degree of meniscal degeneration and meniscus T1 relaxation times. I.a. dGEMRIM do not seem to deliver useful information about meniscus degeneration to be suitable for clinical applications, but i.a. dGEMRIC may still be considered an alternative contrast‐saving method for cartilage.

Kokoelmat
  • Avoin saatavuus [38865]
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen
 

Selaa kokoelmaa

NimekkeetTekijätJulkaisuajatAsiasanatUusimmatSivukartta

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen