Hyppää sisältöön
    • FI
    • ENG
  • FI
  • /
  • EN
OuluREPO – Oulun yliopiston julkaisuarkisto / University of Oulu repository
Näytä viite 
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
  •   OuluREPO etusivu
  • Oulun yliopisto
  • Avoin saatavuus
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparing communication effort within the Scrum, Scrum with Kanban, XP, and Banana development processes

Taibi, Davide; Lenarduzzi, Valentina; Ahmad, Muhammad Ovais; Liukkunen, Kari (2017-06-15)

 
Avaa tiedosto
nbnfi-fe2019040311020.pdf (1.297Mt)
nbnfi-fe2019040311020_meta.xml (31.18Kt)
nbnfi-fe2019040311020_solr.xml (29.22Kt)
Lataukset: 

URL:
https://doi.org/10.1145/3084226.3084270

Taibi, Davide
Lenarduzzi, Valentina
Ahmad, Muhammad Ovais
Liukkunen, Kari
Association for Computing Machinery
15.06.2017

Taibi, D., Lenarduzzi, V., Ahmad, M., Liukkunen, K. (2017) Comparing Communication Effort within the Scrum, Scrum with Kanban, XP, and Banana Development Processes. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE'17), 6 pages. DOI:10.1145/3084226.3084270

https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
© ACM 2017. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive Version of Record was published in EASE'17 : Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1145/3084226.3084270.
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3084226.3084270
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2019040311020
Tiivistelmä

Abstract

Context: Communication plays an important role in any development process. However, communication overhead has been rarely compared among development processes.

Objective: The goal of this work is to compare the communication overhead and the different channels applied in three agile processes (XP, Scrum, Scrum with Kanban) and in an unstructured process.

Method: We designed an empirical study asking four teams to develop the same application with the four development processes, and we compare the communication overhead among them.

Results: As expected, face-to-face communication is most frequently employed in the teams. Scrum with Kanban turned out to be the process that requires the least communication. Unexpectedly, despite requiring much more time to develop the same application, the unstructured process required comparable communication overhead (25% of the total development time) as the agile processes.

Kokoelmat
  • Avoin saatavuus [38840]
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen
 

Selaa kokoelmaa

NimekkeetTekijätJulkaisuajatAsiasanatUusimmatSivukartta

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
oulurepo@oulu.fiOulun yliopiston kirjastoOuluCRISLaturiMuuntaja
SaavutettavuusselosteTietosuojailmoitusYlläpidon kirjautuminen