Predictive value of the mini-nutritional assessment short form (MNA-SF) and nutritional risk screening (NRS2002) in hip fracture
Helminen, Heli; Luukkaala, Tiina; Saarnio, Juha; Nuotio, Maria S. (2018-08-01)
Helminen, H., Luukkaala, T., Saarnio, J., & Nuotio, M. S. (2018). Predictive value of the mini-nutritional assessment short form (MNA-SF) and nutritional risk screening (NRS2002) in hip fracture. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 73(1), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-018-0267-y
This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-018-0267-y
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2019092029058
Tiivistelmä
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To examine Mini-Nutritional Assessment short form (MNA-SF) and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002) as prognostic indicators of postoperative complications, length of hospital stay (LOS), readmissions, mobility, living arrangements and mortality after hip fracture.
Subjects/Methods: Population-based prospective data were collected on 265 consecutive hip fracture patients aged 65 and over. Nutritional status according to MNA-SF and NRS2002 was assessed on admission. Outcomes were postoperative complications, LOS, readmissions and mortality 1 and 4 months post fracture and changes in mobility level and living arrangements 4 months post fracture.
Results: At baseline, 18 (7%) patients were malnourished and 108 (41%) at risk of malnutrition according to MNA-SF. According to NRS2002, 11 (4%) patients were at severe risk and 56 (21%) patients at moderate risk of malnutrition. Only MNA-SF predicted mortality, LOS and readmissions. Both instruments proved ineffective in predicting changes in mobility level and living arrangements.
Conclusions: MNA-SF is superior to NRS2002 in predicting short-term hip fracture outcomes.
Kokoelmat
- Avoin saatavuus [37798]