Academic reading format preferences and behaviors among university students worldwide : a comparative survey analysis
Mizrachi, Diane; Salaz, Alicia M.; Kurbanoglu, Serap; Boustany, Joumana; ARFIS Research Group (2018-05-30)
Mizrachi D, Salaz AM, Kurbanoglu S, Boustany J, on behalf of the ARFIS Research Group (2018) Academic reading format preferences and behaviors among university students worldwide: A comparative survey analysis. PLoS ONE 13(5): e0197444. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197444
© 2018 Mizrachi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2018060625348
Tiivistelmä
Abstract
This study reports the descriptive and inferential statistical findings of a survey of academic reading format preferences and behaviors of 10,293 tertiary students worldwide. The study hypothesized that country-based differences in schooling systems, socioeconomic development, culture or other factors might have an influence on preferred formats, print or electronic, for academic reading, as well as the learning engagement behaviors of students. The main findings are that country of origin has little to no relationship with or effect on reading format preferences of university students, and that the broad majority of students worldwide prefer to read academic course materials in print. The majority of participants report better focus and retention of information presented in print formats, and more frequently prefer print for longer texts. Additional demographic and post-hoc analysis suggests that format preference has a small relationship with academic rank. The relationship between task demands, format preferences and reading comprehension are discussed. Additional outcomes and implications for the fields of education, psychology, computer science, information science and human-computer interaction are considered.
Acknowledgments
Tania Todorova¹, Pan Yantao², Jiuzhen Zhang³, Daniela Živkovic⁴, Darija Pešut⁴, Terttu Kortelainen⁵, Judit Bar-Ilan⁶, Noa Aharony⁶, Elena Collina⁷, Liga Krumina⁸, Hanady Geagea⁹, Silvia Ghinculov¹⁰, Ane Landøy¹¹, Almuth Gastinger¹², Aurora de la Vega¹³, Ana Lúcia Terra¹⁴, Nicole Johnston¹⁵, Angela Repanovici¹⁶, Polona Vilar¹⁷, René Schneider¹⁸, Güleda Dogan¹⁹, Serap Kurbanoglu¹⁹, Patricia Jamal²⁰, David Bawden²¹, Jane Secker²², Chris Morrison²³, A.M. Salaz²⁴, Diane Mizrachi²⁵*, and Joumana Boustany²⁶
¹University of Library Studies and Information Technology, Sofia, Bulgaria
²Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
³Peking University, Beijing, China
⁴University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
⁵Oulu University, Oulu, Finland
⁶Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
⁷Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
⁸Latvijas Universitate, Riga, Latvia
⁹Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
¹⁰Academy of Economic Studies, Chişinău, Moldova
¹¹Bergen University, Bergen, Norway
¹²Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
¹³Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Lima, Peru
¹⁴Instituto Politecnico do Porto, Porto, Portugal
¹⁵Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia
¹⁶Transylvania University, Brașov, Romania
¹⁷University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
¹⁸Haute Ecole de Gestion, Geneva, Switzerland
¹⁹Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
²⁰Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
²¹City University, London, England
²²London School of Economics, London, England
²³Kent University, Canterbury, England
²⁴Carnegie Mellon University, Doha, Qatar
²⁵University of California, Los Angeles, USA
²⁶Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée, Paris, France
Kokoelmat
- Avoin saatavuus [34357]